Was original righteousness natural or supernatural?
 

(Extracts from Francis Turretin, edited into modern English)



1. What Is the Question Really About?

The issue is how Adam was created.

Rome says:

Original righteousness was supernatural, something added on top of human nature.

The Reformed say:

Original righteousness was natural, belonging to human nature as God created it.

This is not a small debate.
It affects how we understand:


2. What Is “Original Righteousness”?

Original righteousness means:

In short:

Adam was created knowing God rightly, loving God sincerely, and obeying God willingly.


3. The Roman Catholic Position (What Turretin Rejects)

Rome teaches:

So sin becomes:

Turretin says this weakens the doctrine of sin and diminishes the need for grace.


4. The Reformed Position (What Turretin Defends)

Original righteousness was natural, not supernatural.

This does not mean:

It means:

God created man as man to be righteous.

Righteousness was:

It belonged to human nature as God originally designed it.


5. Key Argument 1: Creation in God’s Image

Genesis 1:26–27

Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.”

The image of God includes:

Paul confirms this:

Ephesians 4:24

Put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness.”

Colossians 3:10

The new self… renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator.”

Turretin’s logic:

Not an extra gift.
Not a later addition.
But part of what it meant to be human before the Fall.


6. Key Argument 2: God Does Not Create Moral Disorder

God is:

Would God create a rational creature:

That would mean God created man unfinished or defective.

Turretin says:

To lack original righteousness would not be a mere absence of grace, but a moral defect.

And God does not create moral defects.


7. Key Argument 3: The Nature of the Fall

After the Fall, Scripture says:

But you can only lose what you had by nature.

If righteousness were merely supernatural:

Yet Scripture teaches:

This only makes sense if:

Original righteousness belonged to human nature itself.


8. Key Argument 4: Grace Restores Nature, It Does Not Replace It

Redemption in Christ is described as:

Christ does not give us a different kind of humanity.
He restores
true humanity.

So:

And what was lost was not merely a supernatural bonus, but:

righteous human nature itself.


9. Answering a Common Objection

Objection:
If original righteousness was natural, does that mean Adam did not need grace?

Answer:
No.

Turretin carefully explains:

Adam was upright by creation, but:


10. Why This Matters Spiritually

This doctrine teaches us:

  1. How serious sin really is
    Sin is not just missing something extra.
    It is the corruption of our nature.

  2. Why we need sovereign grace
    If our nature is fallen, only God can restore it.

  3. How great salvation in Christ is
    Christ does not merely help us.
    He recreates us.

  4. What true humanity looks like
    Holiness is not unnatural.
    Sin is.


11. Summary in Simple Terms